Area coaches launch training website for multi-sport athletes

It’s an idea that started back in December – between Dave Wiemers and Kaleb Terlip.

“In the days of internet training and recruiting and everything online…”Elite” and “Premier” and all of those things they sell you on to make money, we absolutely want to be the opposite,” Wiemers says.

Wiemers is part of a group that launched the website 3sport.net earlier this month.

It’s a site dedicated to online training for multi-sport athletes – with instructional videos from nine different coaches with college experience, including Wiemers, former Pitt State men’s basketball coach Kevin Muff and former Pitt State baseball coach Tom Myers.

“When you take a group of people who are devoted to their profession and want to see everyone have the opportunity to be better, it was pretty cool to get involved,” Myers says.

It’s a subscription-based service.

The goal is to promote the idea of kids playing multiple sports, to reach athletes who may not have easy access to coaching and provide fundamental work for both players and coaches.

“We want this to be fundamental,” Wiemers says, “We want this to be grassroots. We want this to be stances and starts and what you do before a play even starts. Those things that allow you to maybe eventually get to be a good player, we think are the things that are missing. There’s some high-level stuff on there, don’t get me wrong, but there’s also things on there that if you have a six year old, you can teach them something from our videos.”

“I think it’s going to be a special thing for some of the kids who aren’t close enough to some of the bigger cities with academies that do things year-round,” Myers adds, “This is something that any individual can get ahold of, and hopefully go out and better their game.”

Wiemers says the group plans on adding more coaches and more videos in the future, including adding softball to the list of sports offered on the website.

Wiemers joins Carthage football coaching staff

PITTSBURG, Kan. – Former Pitt State assistant coach Dave Wiemers is returning to the sideline in 2021, joining Jon Guidie and the Carthage Tigers.

Wiemers will serve as offensive coordinator for Carthage High School.

“You never really lose your coaching instincts,” Wiemers says, “I think I can be helpful to them. Obviously it’s not broken over there, they’re just looking for another set of eyes and ears. With where I’m at in coaching, I think I can provide that and give them a good hand and jump in with a program that’s already rolling. I’m excited to be a part of it.”

Wiemers served as head coach at Emporia State from 2001-2006, and as an assistant coach at Pittsburg State for 12 seasons (2008-2019), 10 as defensive coordinator and 2 as offensive coordinator – helping the Gorillas claim the 2011 NCAA Division II National Championship.

He now joins a program in Carthage with similar championship expectations every season.

“That was the biggest attraction for me,” Wiemers says of joining a winning program, “I didn’t want to get into a situation where we were going to have to install something new and change things around….they don’t have anything wrong. They have good players and a good staff. Coach Guidie is a great coach. You get to walk in and the motor is always running.”

Being in the 4-state area for a number of years, Wiemers is familiar with the program at Carthage.

“I didn’t see them a lot, except on video, because I was generally in Oklahoma recruiting, but we always had them in team camp (at Pitt State),” Wiemers says, “They were the one team that you could watch and go “man, they’re running their stuff good.” Their execution is phenomenal, and you could really see that in camp. You could tell it’s a group that knows what they’re doing. You know what you’re walking into, so it was a pretty easy decision…just going to go over there and try to help win some games.”

Trump’s company could face criminal charges in New York City

NEW YORK – Manhattan prosecutors are considering filing criminal charges soon against Donald Trump’s company, stemming from a long-running investigation into the former president’s business dealings.

The New York Times, citing sources familiar with the matter, reported that charges could be filed against the Trump Organization as early as next week related to fringe benefits the company gave to top executives, such as use of apartments, cars and school tuition.

Trump Organization lawyer Ron Fischetti said he met virtually with prosecutors Thursday for around 1 1/2 hours to try and persuade them not to seek a criminal indictment against the company, but that the charges would not be unexpected.

“The charges are absolutely outrageous and unprecedented, if indeed the charges are filed. This is just to get back at Donald Trump,” he told The Associated Press on Friday. “We’re going to plead not guilty and we’ll make a motion to dismiss.”

The Manhattan district attorney’s office declined to comment.

No charges have been filed thus far in the long-running probe. Prosecutors have been scrutinizing Trump’s tax records, subpoenaing documents and interviewing witnesses, including Trump insiders and company executives.

Law enforcement officials familiar with the matter say the investigation has reached a critical point. A grand jury was recently empaneled to weigh evidence and New York Attorney General Letitia James said she was assigning two of her lawyers to work with Vance on the criminal probe while she continues a civil investigation of Trump.

In addition to fringe benefits, prosecutors have looked into whether the Trump Organization lied about the value of real estate holdings to lower taxes or to obtain bank loans or insurance policies on favorable terms. They have also looked into the company’s role in paying hush money to two women who say Trump had affairs with them, accusations Trump has denied.

Some of the scrutiny has been focused on longtime Trump Organization chief financial officer Allen Weisselberg.

Vance’s investigation of Weisselberg, 73, stemmed in part from questions about his son’s use of a Trump apartment at little or no cost, cars leased for the family and tuition payments made to a school attended by Weisselberg’s grandchildren.

Weisselberg’s attorney, Mary Mulligan, declined to comment.

There’s nothing illegal about companies giving lavish perks to valued employees, but in many circumstances those benefits count as compensation subject to income tax.

Fischetti said any charges against the company based on fringe benefits would be overreach by prosecutors.

“We looked back 100 years of cases and we haven’t found one in which an employee has been indicted for fringe benefits – and certainly not a corporation,” he said. For it to be a crime, he said, “it would have to be for the benefit of the corporation with the knowledge of the corporation. They don’t have the evidence at all.”

AP-NORC poll: Most say restrict abortion after 1st trimester

NEW YORK – A solid majority of Americans believe most abortions should be legal in the first three months of a woman’s pregnancy, but most say the procedure should usually be illegal in the second and third trimesters, according to a new poll.

The poll comes just weeks after the U.S. Supreme Court agreed to hear a case involving a currently blocked Mississippi law that would ban abortions after 15 weeks of pregnancy, two weeks into the second trimester. If the high court upholds the law, it would be the first time since the 1973 Roe v. Wade decision confirming a woman’s right to abortion that a state would be allowed to ban abortions before a fetus can survive outside the womb.

The new poll from The Associated Press-NORC Center for Public Affairs Research finds 61% of Americans say abortion should be legal in most or all circumstances in the first trimester of a pregnancy. However, 65% said abortion should usually be illegal in the second trimester, and 80% said that about the third trimester.

Still, the poll finds many Americans believe that the procedure should be allowable under at least some circumstances even during the second or third trimesters. For abortions during the second trimester, 34% say they should usually or always be legal, and another 30% say they should be illegal in most but not all cases. In the third trimester, 19% think most or all abortions should be legal, and another 26% say they should be illegal only in most cases.

Michael New, an abortion opponent who teaches social research at Catholic University of America, predicted the findings regarding second- and third-trimester abortions will be useful to the anti-abortion movement.

“This helps counter the narrative that the abortion policy outcome established by the Roe v. Wade decision enjoys substantial public support,” he said.

David O’Steen, executive director of the National Right to Life Committee, said the findings suggest that abortion rights advocates are “way out of the public mainstream” to the extent that they support abortion access even late in pregnancy.

But Dr. Daniel Grossman, a professor of obstetrics and gynecology at the University of California, San Francisco, who supports abortion rights, cited research showing that Americans viewed second-trimester abortions more empathetically when told about some of the reasons why women seek them.

These include time-consuming difficulties making arrangements with an abortion clinic and learning during the second trimester that the fetus would die or have severe disabilities due to abnormalities, Grossman said.

“More work needs to be done to elevate the voices of people who have had abortions and who want to share their stories to help people understand the many reasons why this medical care is so necessary,” he said via email.

Majorities of Americans – Republicans and Democrats alike – think a pregnant woman should be able to obtain a legal abortion if her life is seriously endangered, if the pregnancy results from rape or incest or if the child would be born with a life-threatening illness.

Americans are closely divided over whether a pregnant woman should be able to obtain a legal abortion if she wants one for any reason, 49% yes to 50% no.

Jenny Ma, senior staff attorney with the Center for Reproductive Rights, said women seeking second-trimester abortions included disproportionately high numbers of young people, Black women and women living in poverty. Some had not learned they were pregnant until much later than the norm; others had trouble raising the needed funds to afford an abortion, Ma said.

She noted that Republican-governed states have enacted numerous restrictions in recent years that often complicated the process for getting even a first-trimester abortion.

“Removing the many existing barriers to earlier abortion care would reduce need for second- and third-trimester abortions,” Ma said.

Abortions after the first trimester are not rare, but they are exceptions to the norm. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, in its most recent report on abortion in the U.S., estimated that 92% of the abortions in 2018 were performed within the first 13 weeks of pregnancy.

The poll also shows how opinions on abortion diverge sharply along party lines. Roughly three-quarters of Democrats think abortion should be legal in all or most cases; about two-thirds of Republicans think it should be illegal in all or most cases.

But most Americans fall between extreme opinions on the issue. Just 23% say abortion in general should be legal in all cases, while 33% say it should be legal in most cases. Thirty percent say abortion should be illegal in most cases; just 13% say it should be illegal in all cases.

Respondents from three major religious groups – white mainline Protestants, nonwhite Protestants and Catholics – are closely divided as to whether abortion should usually be legal or illegal in most cases. It was different for white evangelicals – about three-quarters of them say abortion should be illegal in all or most cases.

Dave Steiner, a hotel manager from suburban Chicago, was among those responding to the AP-NORC poll who said abortion should be legal in the first trimester but generally illegal thereafter.

“I was raised a very strict Catholic — abortion was just no, no, no,” said Steiner, 67. “As I became more liberal and a Democrat, I felt the woman should have the right to choose — but that should be in the first trimester.”

“Abortions are going to happen anyway,” he added. “If you’re making it illegal, you’re just chasing it underground.”

Mr. Food: Grilled PB & M

Have you ever tried a Fluffernutter sandwich? If you haven’t, oh boy, you’re missing out! Our Grilled PB & M has a little bit of a twist on this classic peanut butter and marshmallow creme classic! We take it to the next level by adding a little bit of butter to each side, and cooking it up like a grilled cheese! Talk about a comforting classic.

What You’ll Need

  • 1/2 cup marshmallow creme
  • 8 thick slices egg bread (challah)
  • 1/4 cup peanut butter
  • 2 tablespoons butter, softened, divided

What to Do

  1. Spread the marshmallow creme evenly over 4 slices of bread.
  2. Spread peanut butter over remaining 4 slices of bread and place peanut butter side down over the marshmallow creme; to make sandwiches. Spread 1 tablespoon butter, evenly on top of all 4 sandwiches.
  3. In a large skillet or griddle over medium-high heat, melt remaining 1 tablespoon butter. Place sandwiches buttered-side up in the skillet in batches, if necessary, and cook about 1 minute per side. Turn sandwiches over and cook 1 more minute or until golden and the peanut butter and the marshmallow crème begin to melt. Serve immediately.